the exact nature and evidential value of the data. He asserts that preserving and retaining the data obtained is in the interest of justice, as it may be used as evidence.
The DPP is also seeking an order to retain the electronic devices as exhibits until the final disposal of the case. The application emphasizes that granting this request is in the interest of justice.
This particular application has been fixed for hearing on March 14th 2025.
The Prosecution wanted it to be heard today, but the defense lawyers led by Frederick Mpanga and Erias Lukwago objected, saying that they were served on Thursday and that their clients haven’t gotten an opportunity to look through it. They said they also didn’t know if they still had instructions from Besigye and Lutaale to represent them in this particular matter and wanted to consult them. If they allow, then they will swear affidavits to oppose the application.
The Prosecution, through State Attorney Richard Birivumbuk, asked the court to first strike off the name of A3 from the application such that they remain with A1 and 2 before he proceeds to make his case.
Birivumbuka said they filed this application and served it to counsel of 1and A2 and by its nature, it warranted a short time. He said they are ready to proceed. He doesn’t mention what the application is about.
Mpanga said it’s true; the application was made on March 5th 2025, and served to Lukwago advocates yesterday, but the accused haven’t yet sat and read the details. They don’t know if they will be instructed to continue representing them in this matter or not.
